I'd like to share some information on the harbor freight 45 watt solar panel kit and look a like solar panels made of the same solar cell materials. This post is an attempt to share my concerns and is a warning about these solar panels so please read the findings and draw your own conclusions.
My concerns deal with the 45 watt solar panel kits and those like them being sold by Harbor Freight, Amazon, Northern Tool and others under the Harbor Freight, Sunforce, SunLink and other brands. The "kits" are generally made up of three 15 watt watt solar panels that attach together to make a 45 watt overall system. There are also bigger versions in the 60 watt (four 15 watt) or higher output ratings that use the same type of solar cell panel materials, which I also think could be affected.
My misgivings started after I purchased and used a small 5 watt panel a number of years ago made of the same solar cell material as the larger 15 watt Harbor Freight and other brand panels. I was putting together small solar battery charger systems and I would bring the HF 5 watt panel out to test against some other panels I used. Each time I tested it however, I noticed that it just wasn't performing very well compared to other 5 watt panels I had, and the output was decreasing over time even though it remained in storage out of the sun most of that time.
One panels performance doesn't lend itself to being very objective about all such panels but it bothered me and I was getting a number of questions from people asking about the HF and other similar solar panels, asking for recommendations on using them, which I was struggling to do even with what little I knew.
In my hunt to find any meaningful data that would support my suspicions, I came across this review:http://www.amazon.com/review/R2ZJLCRGOX7T0R
That led me to the report it mentions: http://www.humboldt.edu/~aej1/aSiKen...t_July2_05.pdf or http://www.humboldt.edu/~aej1/Jacobs...Kenya_EP07.pdf
The problem solar panels in the report are with the solar cell chemistry made by a manufacturer in Shenzhen China named the Topray Solar Company.
The panels are made of an amorphous A-SI type solar cell material also known as thin-film. Not all thin-film solar panels have the same problem as the Harbor Freight (HF) panels but the panels made by the same manufacture maybe suspect which brands I mentioned above.
In the report it shows some pictures of the panels with problems. They surprisingly look identical to the Harbor Freight panels. I could conclude that the panel design hasn't changed much in the 5 years since the report was released and any new similar panels could be subject to the same failure rate as the study reported. In summary the report says that of two sets of panels tested under different brand names but both of which were manufactured by the same company, 3 of 4 panels failed completely during the first few months of testing for one of the brands and 1 of 4 failed with the other brand. In addition, the test showed that all panels from both brand also showed a large decrease in their power output of over 50% during the testing period. Meaning that after only a few months in the sun the panels were only supplying 6 watts of power from panels that were initially rated at 14 watts. (Note: the HF panels say 15 watts but under load their actual initial output is 12 watts or less)
I was seeing similar degradation of output on my little 5 watt HF solar panel so I've come to the conclusion maybe unscientifically that there could be bigger problems with the HF and similar panels in general, and caution should be taken in considering these type of solar panels for long term preparedness needs. The solar cell materials in question are like those pictured above. (Click on the image to see a larger version) The panels are dark in a solid color with lines that run that run in parallel every 1/4 inch or so through out the whole panel. This type of solar panel cell materials make up a lot of the more inexpensive solar panels available. You'll find the same solar cells in Harbor Freight/Chicago Electric panels, GoBe folding panels, 15 watt Sunforce, NorthernTool and BatteryMinder panels and other similar looking brands.
My 5 watt HF panel and the Reports from Humbolt are 5 years old and hopefully a lot of improvements have been made in those few years with the solar cell technology in question. I do however want to share my findings and research hopefully to help others avoid problems because they made the assumption that all solar panels were of similar quality when in fact there are big differences that shouldn't be overlooked or at least weighed objectively.




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks